From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12070 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2005 18:03:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 12039 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jul 2005 18:03:13 -0000 Received: from londo.lunn.ch (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:03:13 +0000 Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1DvfNq-0007sL-00; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:02:58 +0200 Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:03:00 -0000 To: paape@Hi-Techniques.com Cc: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org Message-ID: <20050721180258.GL29741@lunn.ch> Mail-Followup-To: paape@Hi-Techniques.com, ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [ECOS] bsd stack buffering X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00229.txt.bz2 On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 12:57:37PM -0500, paape@Hi-Techniques.com wrote: > Hello, > I would like to significantly increase the 256KB limit for socket buffering. > Does anyone know of: 1.) anything that would preclude me from doing this, > whether in the stack or eCos itself? 2.) any other parameter[s] that would > need to be modified in conjuction with this, other than the initial stack > memory allocation? None that i know of. You might also want to increase the number of file descripters and sockets. Andrew -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss