From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19071 invoked by alias); 28 Oct 2005 15:22:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19029 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Oct 2005 15:22:17 -0000 Received: from av-217-129-133-89.netvisao.pt (HELO epilog.ath.cx) (217.129.133.89) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:22:16 +0000 Received: from duckman by epilog.ath.cx with local (Exim 4.54) id 1EVW3V-0005r3-9h for ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 16:22:09 +0100 From: Carlos Sobrinho Reply-To: duckman@epilog.ath.cx To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 15:22:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 References: <200510281512.30985.duckman@epilog.ath.cx> <200510281603.35804.duckman@epilog.ath.cx> <1130512129.5754.134.camel@hermes> In-Reply-To: <1130512129.5754.134.camel@hermes> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1946568.sEXEXZUaML"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200510281622.09087.duckman@epilog.ath.cx> Subject: Re: [ECOS] I2C and SPI porting help X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00273.txt.bz2 --nextPart1946568.sEXEXZUaML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-length: 1300 > As long as the work is truly yours, just put "self" I'll explain better. The graphical code is mine. The Sharp's GP2Dx2 is mine based on their datasheet information. No code in= =20 the datasheet, only schematics of the transfers. The same for the sonar. The Nokia device driver is based on the controller's datasheet and 4/5 line= s=20 (the initialization) of some PIC assembly code. Do I only need my copyright assignment on this conditions? Regarding the committing, I'll need some help with the CDL part since its n= ew=20 to me. Also, some drivers need a 50/80ms wait and only one has a polled way of=20 checking for new measures (I2C sonar) so I guess they all need the kernel o= r=20 am I wrong? Also, what should be the way to select the GPIO pins? Should the drivers be device/CPU or platform or board type/specific? WBR Carlos Sobrinho > > I'd suggest that you send separate patches for each of the major > components. That way, we can comment on them individually (it also > makes checking and thinking about them much simpler) > --=20 ###########################################################################= ## # Give them RADAR-GUIDED SKEE-BALL LANES and VELVEETA BURRITOS!! = # ###########################################################################= ## --nextPart1946568.sEXEXZUaML Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 189 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDYkIhSBCKveLU3XwRAtIdAJoDImc4Iv9qEy7M6F+huduvWSeizgCfVTv0 SwFRamTHKmwMva+qVHiQ3LE= =x/PQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1946568.sEXEXZUaML--