From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27670 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2006 08:23:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 27654 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Jan 2006 08:23:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from londo.lunn.ch (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 08:23:35 +0000 Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Exgh3-00052R-00; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:23:25 +0100 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 08:23:00 -0000 To: Jay Foster Cc: 'Grant Edwards' , ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org Message-ID: <20060114082325.GJ3085@lunn.ch> Mail-Followup-To: Jay Foster , 'Grant Edwards' , ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org References: <74C9525D67A5FF4791614FDB06593BB1028532@mail.systech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <74C9525D67A5FF4791614FDB06593BB1028532@mail.systech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 From: Andrew Lunn X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] Re: DSR Scheduling Problem X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00115.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:44:34PM -0800, Jay Foster wrote: > I still think that FIFO queuing of the DSRs is better than LIFO queuing, Well you have the source. Make eCos do what you want. If you add the appropriate CDL to control it i might consider integrating it into anoncvs. Andrew -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss