From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27344 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2006 20:39:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 27334 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Mar 2006 20:39:04 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from londo.lunn.ch (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:39:02 +0000 Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1FHRuU-0001eZ-00; Thu, 09 Mar 2006 21:38:58 +0100 Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:39:00 -0000 To: "Doyle, Patrick" Cc: "'ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org'" Message-ID: <20060309203858.GI19406@lunn.ch> Mail-Followup-To: "Doyle, Patrick" , "'ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org'" References: <3EDBCCE80E95E744A99895CA464987C4A7D295@dtcsrvr09> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EDBCCE80E95E744A99895CA464987C4A7D295@dtcsrvr09> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 From: Andrew Lunn X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] JFFS2 on ARM target X-SW-Source: 2006-03/txt/msg00107.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:19:08PM -0500, Doyle, Patrick wrote: > Hello again Andrew, > > OK, I've poked around a bit... > > What I've seen is that the jffs2 tree has migrated a bit since it was > imported into the eCos tree. The other thing I've seen is an "ecos" > directory which has your fingerprints all over it :-) Yes, but not for a while. As you said, the jffs2 tree has moved on quite a lot. I've no idea if it will compile inside eCos any more. > I'm not in a position right now to upgrade eCos to the latest jffs2, so what > I would like to do is to submit ?yvind's patch (suitably updated to reflect > the latest changes in jffs2) to the jffs2 maintainer while simultaneously > submitting the same patch (suitably not updated) for integration into eCos. I expect it will be reject. It was when Oyvind submitted the patch. There response was something like: Gcc is broken, fix gcc. Andrew -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss