From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30507 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2006 22:24:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 30499 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Apr 2006 22:24:25 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from LLMAIL.LL.MIT.EDU (HELO ll.mit.edu) (129.55.12.40) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:24:23 +0000 Received: (from smtp@localhost) by ll.mit.edu (8.12.10/8.8.8) id k3JMOKIj005435 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2006 18:24:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200604192224.k3JMOKIj005435@ll.mit.edu> Received: from UNKNOWN( ), claiming to be "mitadhk5k1w30d" via SMTP by llmail, id smtpdAAAuHaawk; Wed Apr 19 18:24:09 2006 From: "Scott Bailie" To: Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 22:24:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [ECOS] fat filename length X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00195.txt.bz2 I've noticed that only 8.3 filenames under FAT. I poked around in fatfs_supp.c where it looks like this limitation is hard coded. Has anyone made the necessary changes to support long filenames? Is there any plan to do so? Thanks, Scott _________________ Scott Bailie MIT LINCOLN LAB 781.981.4140 -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss