From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5307 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2006 13:21:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 5285 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Apr 2006 13:21:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from web15403.mail.cnb.yahoo.com (HELO web15403.mail.cnb.yahoo.com) (202.43.216.206) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with SMTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:21:07 +0000 Received: (qmail 40020 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Apr 2006 13:21:03 -0000 Message-ID: <20060420132103.40018.qmail@web15403.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> Received: from [221.8.155.116] by web15403.mail.cnb.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:21:03 CST Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 13:21:00 -0000 From: hui liu To: yh@bizmail.com.au Cc: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <1174.203.217.29.133.1145506497.squirrel@203.217.29.133> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [ECOS] =?gb2312?q?=BB=D8=B8=B4=A3=BA=20Re:=20[ECOS]=20Re:=20Intel=20LXT971?= X-SW-Source: 2006-04/txt/msg00201.txt.bz2 Maybe you should change some lines in your codes because of the contorl register differences between RTL820 and LXT971.You can find in their documents. --- yh@bizmail.com.auдµÀ: > Thanks Gary. It is actually a ship set from Intel > LXT971ABE A4 L549ID42. > The Ethernet of our board worked when the RTL820 was > used, but now the > redboot cannot connect to the network since > replacing to Intel LXT971. > Sorry, I am new to the redboot. I thought to get > some advices from experts > on this list before plunging into the debug. Any > more information and > helps would be great appreciated. > > Thank you. > > Jim > > > On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 11:36 +1000, > yh@bizmail.com.au wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Does current redboot (ecos version 2.0) support > Intel Ethernet chipset > >> LXT971? > > > > eCos 2.0 is nearly 4 years old - hardly current. > > > > The LXT97x is an ethernet PHY (which is just the > physical layer > > used by some ethernet chips). Normally, there is > little (or nothing) > > required to control these devices - they just do > their job. They do > > have a control interface whereby you can set the > hardware bit rate, > > e.g. 100Mb or 10Mb, detect the presence of a > carrier/cable, etc. > > They are not [directly] responsible for passing > ethernet data, that > > job is handled by some other device. > > > > You need to figure out what the actual ethernet > device is; depending > > on the platform, this may be a separate device > like an 82559 chip, > > etc, or it may be builtin to the CPU (SOC), e.g. > on the XScale devices. > > > > -- > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Gary Thomas | Consulting for the > > MLB Associates | Embedded world > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > -- > Before posting, please read the FAQ: > http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos > and search the list archive: > http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss > > ___________________________________________________________ ÑÅ»¢1GÃâ·ÑÓÊÏä°Ù·Ö°Ù·ÀÀ¬»øÐÅ http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/ -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss