public inbox for ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: "Chase, Tom" <tomc@dtccom.com>
Cc: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [ECOS] cyg_thread_delay vs cyg_flag_wait behavior
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 17:20:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060619172009.GD4218@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F7F756E5ED50F345959AE893AD2F156608C6EA@dtcsrvr09.dtccom.com>

On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 09:07:26AM -0400, Chase, Tom wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am working on my fourth ecos project.  Historically I have had a thread
> monitoring a serial port.  The thread has the lowest priority and sits at a
> getc until some data arrives then deals with it.  This has worked well for
> debugging and configuration allowing a PC application to talk to the device
> and set up frequencies or what not.
> 
> On the latest project this isn't working reliably.  It will work for a few
> bytes of data then stop responding.  The change in performance appears to be
> related to cyg_thread_delay vs. cyg_flag_wait.  For the first time, I have a
> higher priority thread that has no cyg_thread_delays in it.  It sits at a
> cyg_flag_wait most of the time (servicing flags every 100 to 250 ms).  If I
> add a cyg_thread_delay to that thread (putting it just before the flag_wait
> for example) then the serial behavior is as I expect.
> 
> I am working on an OMAP5912 and using the interrupt driven serial.  I have
> verified that the thread is indeed waking up from the wait as I expect (10
> times a second) and not always running (I.E. there is time available for
> lower priority threads).  I have tried using various settings (buffered, non
> buffered, stdin, TTY etc.) with no change in performance.  I have a
> cyg_thread_delay that is called when the unit prepares to power down (to
> lock out the keyboard) and any buffered serial inputs are handled then
> (which is one clue to why this was happening).
> 
> I can add a delay but I would like to understand the differences between
> these two functions while they are blocking.  Conceptually I think of the
> delay and the wait doing the same thing and do not understand why they
> behave differently while they are in effect.  Can anyone advise?  

It sounds like the thread that is waiting is actually spinning inside
the wait function. From the sources:

    // this loop allows us to deal correctly with spurious wakeups
    while ( result && (0 == saveme.value_out) ) {
        self->set_sleep_reason( Cyg_Thread::WAIT );
        self->sleep();
        // keep track of myself on the queue of waiting threads
        queue.enqueue( self );

        // Allow other threads to run
        Cyg_Scheduler::reschedule();

So there is a while loop there making a spin possible. I would take a
closer look at this and see if it really is spinning rather than
sleeping, and if so why.

          Andrew

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-19 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-19 13:07 Chase, Tom
2006-06-19 17:20 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2014-10-17 15:14 Leschke Serafin (lesc)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060619172009.GD4218@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org \
    --cc=tomc@dtccom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).