From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22038 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2007 10:28:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 22024 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jan 2007 10:28:50 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from 85-126-107-146.static.sdsl-line.inode.at (HELO mail.contec.at) (85.126.107.146) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:28:44 +0000 Received: from comixs.contec-int.at (unknown [192.168.1.250]) by mail.contec.at (Firewall Mailer Daemon) with ESMTP id 80B12C0867 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:28:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from grma-linux-2.contec-int.at ([192.168.1.216]) by comixs.contec-int.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:28:35 +0100 From: Manfred Gruber To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:28:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200611062005.02197.m.gruber@tirol.com> <20070127132258.GK22661@lunn.ch> In-Reply-To: <20070127132258.GK22661@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701291128.36951.m.gruber@tirol.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] Spansion Flash Chips Type N/M X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00164.txt.bz2 Am Samstag, 27. Januar 2007 14:22 schrieb Andrew Lunn: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 08:05:01PM +0100, Manfred Gruber wrote: > > Hi ! > > > > I am using Spansion Flash SG29GLXXXM types with Flash V2 branche on > > redboot for a while now. At changing to the N Type (has other sector size > > 0x20000, M has 0x10000) of this flashes, I found some problems with the > > bit-toggle algorithms. Can someone verify if this patch for FLASH V2 > > branche can go up to cvs, or mybe it helps someone with spansion flashes? > > The code is from the spansion homepage. > > > > The biggest problems i found were when 2 Flash Chips with 16 bit bus are > > on a 32 bit databus. Maybe someone can test the patch on AM29XXX chips > > how it works? > > This is an old email requesting some volunteers for testing. > > Has anybody used this patch? Does it work O.K. Hi Andrew ! I use it now for a while, not in production systems but now for a while in my development bootloader. We use SGL128/256 and 512 M chips and it looks that it works on them correct. But I would think someone else should test it in/on a other environment/board as well... Regards manfred -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss