From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29975 invoked by alias); 15 Feb 2007 00:45:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 29967 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Feb 2007 00:45:39 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from londo.lunn.ch (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:45:34 +0000 Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1HHUkd-0003qc-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 01:45:31 +0100 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:45:00 -0000 To: Ahmed Abdelkhalek Cc: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org Message-ID: <20070215004531.GB4385@lunn.ch> Mail-Followup-To: Ahmed Abdelkhalek , ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org References: <808050.52987.qm@web62015.mail.re1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <808050.52987.qm@web62015.mail.re1.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Andrew Lunn X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] pthread processor binding X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00162.txt.bz2 On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 04:07:56PM -0800, Ahmed Abdelkhalek wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Some pthread implementations allow binding a thread > for execution on a particular processor or a set of > processors (google pthread_pset_bind_np). Are there > plans to include this in future ecos realeases? None that i know of. Does this even make sense in an RTOS? I've not thought about this long enough to answer that question... Anyway feel free to implement it yourself. Andrew -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss