From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6968 invoked by alias); 9 Apr 2007 14:20:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 6920 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Apr 2007 14:20:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from londo.lunn.ch (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:20:11 +0100 Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1HauiR-0001wh-00; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 16:19:31 +0200 Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 14:20:00 -0000 To: Alexander Neundorf Cc: eCos Disuss Message-ID: <20070409141931.GA7424@lunn.ch> Mail-Followup-To: Alexander Neundorf , eCos Disuss References: <458f08c20704020730i760891e3qb32742ed13007726@mail.gmail.com> <458f08c20704090628qbc9ed14m5848a7e63a45ce7e@mail.gmail.com> <20070409133017.GL19664@lunn.ch> <200704091603.31431.neundorf@kde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200704091603.31431.neundorf@kde.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Andrew Lunn X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] imx31 litekit redboot support X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:03:30PM +0200, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Monday 09 April 2007 15:30, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:28:52PM +0300, HASAN H?SEYIN YILMAZ wrote: > > > these patches included in freescales BSP release. I think they should > > > publish their work themselves right ?? I am not sure I can release > > > their patches ?? > > > > Where do i get the BSP from? Can you give me a URL? > > > > FreeScale has to publish the work, you cannot do that. > > Sure ? > If he received the modified ecos sources, they are under GPL+exception, so he > should have every right to publish the ecos sources as he received them. > Am I wrong here ? Sorry, i used the wrong term. He can distribute the code under the GPL. However he cannot contribute it to eCos since only the copyright holder can do that. Without the contribution from FreeScale, i cannot incorporate his patch into anoncvs. Andrew -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss