From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24696 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2007 19:24:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 24595 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Jun 2007 19:24:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from londo.lunn.ch (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:24:32 +0000 Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1I0jJS-0003jH-00; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:24:26 +0200 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:39:00 -0000 To: Tad Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com Message-ID: <20070619192426.GF24842@lunn.ch> Mail-Followup-To: Tad , ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com References: <46783A66.4040503@ds3switch.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46783A66.4040503@ds3switch.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: Andrew Lunn X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] Is arpresolve() good to get ARP started on an IP address? X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2 On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 12:19:50PM -0800, Tad wrote: > SNMP agent is dropping coldstart and LinkUp traps since ARP table comes > up without entries Maybe i don't understand what you are saying, but if there is no ARP entry, the IP packet which needs to be sent is normally queued and an ARP request is sent out. Once an ARP reply is received the queues packet is then sent. Is this not happening? Andrew -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss