From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31349 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2008 18:49:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 31341 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Apr 2008 18:49:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from pv317.ncsrv.de (HELO www.neundorf.net) (89.110.157.62) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 03 Apr 2008 18:49:12 +0000 Received: by www.neundorf.net (Postfix, from userid 5001) id A6E44B370008; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 20:48:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (88-134-31-133-dynip.superkabel.de [88.134.31.133]) by www.neundorf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB47B370008 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2008 20:48:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Alexander Neundorf Reply-To: neundorf@kde.org To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:01:00 -0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47F3D7DB.4000405@eCosCentric.com> In-Reply-To: <47F3D7DB.4000405@eCosCentric.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804032053.00959.neundorf@kde.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] Are copyright assignments detrimental to eCos? X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2 On Wednesday 02 April 2008, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > Øyvind Harboe wrote: ... > > Why should *all* of eCos require copyright assignments? > > All contributions at any rate. Is it really also necessary for ecosconfig and configtool ? They are useless without eCos and the only precompiled package I can find is very old and a bit buggy. Making contributing easier could help here, which could also include opening the host tools directories in cvs for more developers. Alex -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss