From: Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com>
To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [ECOS] Are copyright assignments detrimental to eCos?
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:13:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080404180913.785f477c@kingfisher.sec.intern.logix-tt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080404180557.66980368@kingfisher.sec.intern.logix-tt.com>
Hi, Markus,
Markus Schaber <schabi@logix-tt.com> wrote:
> That does not hold true in case of FSF-Style copright assignments. I
> don't know the eCos assignment clauses exactly,
I just was told that the eCos copyright assignment is not to RedHat
or eCosCentric, but to the FSF.
That falsifies my statements about the RedHat sales droids, I presume,
although there are still the "for other licenses, contact RedHat"
statements scattered over the web and source.
Regards,
Markus
--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS
Fight against software patents in Europe! www.ffii.org
www.nosoftwarepatents.org
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-04 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-28 2:59 Øyvind Harboe
2008-04-02 19:01 ` Jonathan Larmour
2008-04-03 9:38 ` Markus Schaber
[not found] ` <47F4A57F.1080501@gaisler.com>
2008-04-03 11:14 ` Jiri Gaisler
2008-04-03 18:49 ` Alexander Neundorf
[not found] ` <47F55A47.7070602@gaisler.com>
2008-04-03 22:40 ` Jiri Gaisler
2008-04-04 4:11 ` Alexander Neundorf
2008-04-04 9:02 ` Markus Schaber
[not found] ` <47F5F130.2030800@gaisler.com>
2008-04-04 9:36 ` Jiri Gaisler
[not found] ` <20080404114231.7efcf59a@kingfisher.sec.intern.logix-tt.com>
[not found] ` <47F5FC4A.2080401@gaisler.com>
2008-04-04 10:50 ` Jiri Gaisler
2008-04-04 15:33 ` Alex Schuilenburg
2008-04-04 16:09 ` Markus Schaber
2008-04-04 16:13 ` Markus Schaber [this message]
2008-04-04 16:25 ` Andrew Lunn
2008-04-04 16:26 ` Markus Schaber
2008-04-04 14:58 ` Andrew Lunn
[not found] ` <47F6450C.4090302@gaisler.com>
2008-04-04 15:17 ` Jiri Gaisler
2008-04-04 16:06 ` Alex Schuilenburg
[not found] ` <47F65C78.5050005@gaisler.com>
2008-04-04 23:18 ` Jiri Gaisler
2008-04-05 0:44 ` Jonathan Larmour
2008-04-07 12:18 ` Alex Schuilenburg
[not found] ` <47FA1CE4.8090708@gaisler.com>
2008-04-07 13:17 ` Jiri Gaisler
2008-04-07 13:28 ` Gary Thomas
[not found] ` <47FA2438.4090904@gaisler.com>
2008-04-07 13:44 ` Jiri Gaisler
2008-04-07 15:51 ` Gregg Levine
2008-04-04 15:45 ` Andrew Lunn
[not found] ` <47F642D0.7000907@xylanta.com>
2008-04-04 15:17 ` Andrew Lunn
2008-04-04 15:20 ` Andy Jackson
2008-04-04 16:47 ` Markus Schaber
2008-04-07 8:00 ` Gary Thomas
2008-04-04 10:00 ` Chris Zimman
2008-04-04 15:09 ` Andrew Lunn
2008-04-04 15:46 ` Chris Zimman
2008-04-03 18:46 ` Bart Veer
2008-04-03 19:01 ` Alexander Neundorf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080404180913.785f477c@kingfisher.sec.intern.logix-tt.com \
--to=schabi@logix-tt.com \
--cc=ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).