From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22633 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2008 08:28:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 22625 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Oct 2008 08:28:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from londo.lunn.ch (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:28:20 +0000 Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1KtI1o-0003LX-00; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:28:16 +0200 Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:44:00 -0000 From: Andrew Lunn To: "simon.kallweit@intefo.ch" Cc: eCos Disuss Message-ID: <20081024082816.GE12247@lunn.ch> Mail-Followup-To: "simon.kallweit@intefo.ch" , eCos Disuss References: <49017189.80907@intefo.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49017189.80907@intefo.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] Cortex-M3 port X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00180.txt.bz2 > * I'm currently trying to merge the flash_v2 branch into the trunk. This > seems to be not exactly trivial (or I'm just stupid :) Isn't it time to > do the merge into the official trunk and spare the hassle in the future? > Is there anything going against the merge? Or why hasn't it be done yet? This is a goal for the next release of eCos. I also know some people in the community do have such a merged tree. So maybe somebody can send you there work. Andrew -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss