From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11938 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2008 09:54:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 11929 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Nov 2008 09:54:08 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from londo.lunn.ch (HELO londo.lunn.ch) (80.238.139.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:53:33 +0000 Received: from lunn by londo.lunn.ch with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1L6iza-0001ka-00; Sun, 30 Nov 2008 10:53:30 +0100 Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:41:00 -0000 From: Andrew Lunn To: Simon Kallweit Cc: eCos Disuss Message-ID: <20081130095330.GF27015@lunn.ch> Mail-Followup-To: Simon Kallweit , eCos Disuss References: <493019B0.2020005@intefo.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <493019B0.2020005@intefo.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] LWIP 1.3 porting X-SW-Source: 2008-11/txt/msg00232.txt.bz2 On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 05:17:52PM +0100, Simon Kallweit wrote: > Hi > > as Jonathan has pointed out that there > are some design flaws with the current implementation. Any help is > obviously greatly appreciated. Is Jifl prepared to give some hints what is wrong with the current implementation? Or is that eCosCentric IP? Andrew -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss