From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11196 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2008 17:39:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 11138 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Dec 2008 17:39:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (HELO qw-out-1920.google.com) (74.125.92.150) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:38:27 +0000 Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 4so1031301qwk.24 for ; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 09:38:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.214.184.7 with SMTP id h7mr15164532qaf.178.1228412304579; Thu, 04 Dec 2008 09:38:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.gmail.com ([93.85.53.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 4sm8721054qwe.51.2008.12.04.09.38.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 04 Dec 2008 09:38:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 01:09:00 -0000 From: Sergei Gavrikov To: Jonathan Larmour Cc: eCos discuss list Message-ID: <20081204173828.GA10103@ubuntu.local> References: <20080827145131.GA12261@ubuntu.local> <48B7FFC9.7040605@eCosCentric.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <48B7FFC9.7040605@eCosCentric.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] Looking in a future: VCS for eCos 3.0 X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2 On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 02:55:21PM +0100, Jonathan Larmour wrote: > A switch of VCS is probably something to tackle very soon after eCos 3.0 > rather than before. I agree that it's time to move forward from CVS. > > I've had a look at Bazaar and would need a bit of convincing personally, at > the least at this stage of its development. I found this an interesting > read: > http://sayspy.blogspot.com/2006/11/bazaar-vs-mercurial-unscientific.html > (including the comments). I'm still more inclined towards Mercurial, > although SVN is an obvious possibility just really due to its more > widespread use and slightly better client support (in addition both of > which are available on sourceware.org, but Bazaar isn't). But I'd really > really prefer to have something distributed. Hello Just FYI: Mercurial 1.1 released 2008-12-2. How they said, This is a larger feature release. http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/WhatsNew Sergei > When the time comes, we can see what it looks like then. The decision isn't > just mine of course. > > Jifl -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss