From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4087 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2012 21:34:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 3872 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Sep 2012 21:34:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from outbound004.roc2.bluetie.com (HELO outbound004.roc2.bluetie.com) (208.89.132.144) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 21:34:10 +0000 Received: from web008.roc2.bluetie.com ([10.200.2.102]) by outbound004.roc2.bluetie.com with bizsmtp id 4Ma91k0022C3R5E01Ma9hY; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:34:09 -0400 X-CMAE-OUT-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=XIGyuHdE c=1 sm=1 a=U5UQ-DSL844A:10 a=i-wQWBNYtOgA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=FmX3VfpdAAAA:8 a=QoHJ8kPOAAAA:8 a=_xNqs6h_rO0A:10 a=1_sxWUBrKm_TLtjta7wA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=DaNu5FgYbKgAWmLyLTbO4Q==:117 X-CMAE-OUT-Score: 0.00 Received: from web008.roc2.bluetie.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by web008.roc2.bluetie.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751383186E9 for ; Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:34:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20120927173409.1868@web008.roc2.bluetie.com> X-HTTP-Received: from kenkyee.excite [64.145.41.116] by web008.roc2.bluetie.com (BlueTie WebMail ); Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:34:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 21:34:00 -0000 Cc: To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org From: "Ken Yee" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [ECOS] Re: possible bug in configtool or whatever is generating "target.ld" file X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 John Dallaway wrote: > The fact that "SECTION_sram_code" appears in your target.ld output > suggests that this macro is used in the target-specific .ldi file but is > not defined in the architecture-specific .ld file and is therefore not > being replaced by the C preprocessor. That was it...thanks much :-) -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss