From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Larmour To: Jesper Skov Cc: Paleologos Spanos , ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [ECOS] Unique priorities Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 09:35:00 -0000 Message-id: <3A5DEED6.487D947F@redhat.com> References: <3A5DE5C4.33B37AA0@redhat.com> <14941.60868.749671.374067@thinktwice.zoftcorp.dk> X-SW-Source: 2001-01/msg00192.html Jesper Skov wrote: > Yup :) It haunted the stress_threads test for a while as it didn't > get the priorities it had asked for. Doh! Sorry I missed that (and I always believed the bitmap sched blew up if given threads with equal priorities). > But it's not good that those two are not consistent. File a bug? Actually it probably is consistent - it's just a sanity check that the uniquifying :) did happen correctly presumably. Jifl -- Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062 Un cheval, pas du glue. Pas du cheval, beaucoup du glue. || Opinions==mine