From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Larmour To: "Lewin A.R.W. Edwards" Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [ECOS] How to run eCos in SMDK41100 board Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:41:00 -0000 Message-id: <3A779752.5A2F29@redhat.com> References: <001a01c08b2f$56472200$c408aa0a@inc.inventec> <3A7780B3.598D1676@redhat.com> <000501c08b38$345fd8e0$c408aa0a@inc.inventec> <4.3.2.7.2.20010130225032.00a96900@larwe.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010130230539.00b14720@larwe.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010130231450.00b0a430@larwe.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010130232359.00b0a650@larwe.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-01/msg00494.html "Lewin A.R.W. Edwards" wrote: > > >Thumb is not supported in any form in gcc 2.95.2. You have to use a > >snapshot, which is what the instructions on the web page say. > > These instructions still talk about the 20000313 snapshot. It may be my > personal CVS jinx, but the instructions on > < http://sources.redhat.com/ecos/tools/win-thumb-elf.html > do not work > (fails either building or configuring that 20000313 gcc snapshot; I forget > which). Ah, that's a mistake then. Mentioning that snapshot date was included by accident because it was a boilerplate. > It's therefore fairly certain that this process was either not > tested with the above checkout date under cygwin, or the Red Hat anoncvs > server when requested for a snapshot of that date gives something > different. (The stackalign.pat doesn't apply either, or at least didn't for > me). Mentioning that checkout date was the mistake, that's all. Using a recent snapshot should result in much better behaviour. And the descripion of stackalign.pat does say it doesn't apply for snapshots after 2000-03-13. I'll remove the snapshot date. Jifl -- Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062 Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine