From: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour@redhat.com>
To: Grant Edwards <grante@visi.com>
Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [ECOS] Redboot: net_io_getc_nonblock not setting return value?
Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 09:52:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A842E57.243557EF@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010209113640.A4438@visi.com>
Grant Edwards wrote:
>
> I'm getting a compiler warning about net_io_getc_nonblock not
> returning a value. The routine looks like this:
>
> 160 static cyg_bool
> 161 net_io_getc_nonblock(void* __ch_data, cyg_uint8* ch)
> 162 {
> 163 if (_net_io_getc_nonblock(__ch_data, ch)) {
> 164 if (*ch == TELNET_IAC) {
> 165 cyg_uint8 esc;
> 166 // Telnet escape - need to read/handle more
> 167 while (!_net_io_getc_nonblock(__ch_data, &esc)) ;
> 168 if (esc == TELNET_IP) {
> 169 // Special case for ^C == Interrupt Process
> 170 *ch = 0x03;
> 171 // Just in case the other end needs synchronizing
> 172 net_io_putc(__ch_data, TELNET_IAC);
> 173 net_io_putc(__ch_data, TELNET_WONT);
> 174 net_io_putc(__ch_data, TELNET_TM);
> 175 net_io_flush();
> 176 return true;
> 177 }
> 178 if (esc == TELNET_DO) {
> 179 // Telnet DO option
> 180 while (!_net_io_getc_nonblock(__ch_data, &esc)) ;
> 181 // Respond with WONT option
> 182 net_io_putc(__ch_data, TELNET_IAC);
> 183 net_io_putc(__ch_data, TELNET_WONT);
> 184 net_io_putc(__ch_data, esc);
> 185 return false; // Ignore this whole thing!
> 186 }
> 187 }
> 188 } else {
> 189 return false;
> 190 }
> 191 }
>
> Should there be a "return true;" either between lines 187/188
> or just before the final brace at line 191?
It should probably just have a default return false at the end. i.e. just
> 187 }
> 188 }
> 189 return false;
> 191 }
I'll change it.
Jifl
--
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-09 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-09 9:32 Grant Edwards
2001-02-09 9:52 ` Jonathan Larmour [this message]
2001-02-09 10:09 ` Grant Edwards
2001-02-09 10:26 ` Jonathan Larmour
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3A842E57.243557EF@redhat.com \
--to=jlarmour@redhat.com \
--cc=ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=grante@visi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).