From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9843 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2002 21:07:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9828 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2002 21:07:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO executor.cambridge.redhat.com) (195.224.55.237) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2002 21:07:37 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (murgh.cambridge.redhat.com [172.16.18.70]) by executor.cambridge.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0619BABB0D; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 22:07:37 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <3CCF0799.AE2269C8@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 14:07:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Victor Volpe Cc: eCos Discuss References: <4626F2D6892CD61183E00090277A3DDE139DDC@liam.cisco.com> <1019717069.18348.30.camel@thinktwice.zoftcorp.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [ECOS] Memory Protection X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00487.txt.bz2 Jesper Skov wrote: > > On Wed, 2002-04-24 at 22:31, Victor Volpe wrote: > > I could not find any information on memory protection in the documentation. > > Can someone let me know if eCos has MMU support and if it does, does it > > support per thread memory protection. > > No (in the sense you are probably think about) and no. Although if you happen to be using the SA1110, you may want to look at http://www.3glab.org/ Jifl -- Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062 --[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]-- --[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss