From: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour@redhat.com>
To: benny@voicepump.com
Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com, cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: [ECOS] Multi-ICE support Status
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 09:59:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3CE293D3.352DC72@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OMEPJJGAMLFGHOOCIGBCCEJACJAA.benny5@mindspring.com>
benny wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
> I followed the nice instructions on
> http://sources.redhat.com/ecos/multi-ice.html
> and all was fine till the last stage when the linker complained on two
> missed symbols in
> ARM library toolconf:
>
> gcc -g -O2 -o multi-ice-gdb-server.exe -Wl,--subsystem,console
> server-main.o r
> di150-low.o remote-utils.o utils.o server-win.o arm-singlestep.o
> MICE-gdbserverr
> es.o -L../../libiberty -liberty -lshell32 -ladvapi32 -lgdi32 -luser32 -L/cyg
> driv
> e/C/Multi-ICE/libraries -L/tmp/migdb/build/gdb/multi-ice -ltoolconf
> /cygdrive/C/Multi-ICE/libraries/toolconf.lib(toolconf.obj.b)(.text+0x25):..\
> ..\t
> oolconf.c: undefined reference to `_imp___isctype'
> /cygdrive/C/Multi-ICE/libraries/toolconf.lib(toolconf.obj.b)(.text+0x2f):..\
> ..\t
> oolconf.c: undefined reference to `_imp___pctype'
>
> Any ideas what library is missing (looks like something from Visual C?)
Actually it looks like something from Cygwin.
Cygwin guys, can you help on this? What has changed that has caused
libraries to stop being binary compatible?
Jifl
--
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-15 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-14 15:28 benny
2002-05-15 9:59 ` Jonathan Larmour [this message]
2002-05-15 10:26 ` Corinna Vinschen
2002-05-15 12:33 ` Jonathan Larmour
2002-05-15 13:13 ` Jonathan Larmour
2002-05-15 14:10 ` benny
2002-05-16 15:38 ` benny
2002-05-16 16:51 ` Jonathan Larmour
2002-05-24 16:32 ` benny
2002-05-15 10:36 ` benny
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-14 22:32 Ashok I.
2002-04-30 10:54 ` Jonathan Larmour
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3CE293D3.352DC72@redhat.com \
--to=jlarmour@redhat.com \
--cc=benny@voicepump.com \
--cc=cygwin@cygwin.com \
--cc=ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).