From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19620 invoked by alias); 21 May 2002 14:44:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19598 invoked from network); 21 May 2002 14:44:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO executor.cambridge.redhat.com) (195.224.55.237) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 21 May 2002 14:44:57 -0000 Received: from redhat.com (murgh.cambridge.redhat.com [172.16.18.70]) by executor.cambridge.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A93ABB0F; Tue, 21 May 2002 14:06:00 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <3CEA4637.44BC3EB5@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 07:44:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: peter_ku Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com References: <000101c20079$76e299c0$790114ac@issc.com.tw> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [ECOS] GNU tools combination for eCos X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2 peter_ku wrote: > > Hi > > thanks a lot. > I give up the Windows Me, and start to use Windows 2000. it looks ok to build all the tools. > binutils 2.10.1 > GCC2.95.2 + ecos-gcc-2952.pat > Insight 5.0 + insight-tcl.pat > > If I want to use insight5.1 or insight5.2, is it also fine to build by GCC2.92.2 and binutils 2.10.1 ? Remember that the GCC and binutils you are using here are to build compilers for the *target*. Insight builds completely separately. Jifl -- Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062 --[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]-- --[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss