From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29611 invoked by alias); 5 Nov 2002 04:37:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 29604 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2002 04:37:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jifvik.dyndns.org) (62.253.130.87) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 2002 04:37:51 -0000 Received: from eCosCentric.com (garibaldi.jifvik.org [172.31.1.2]) by jifvik.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gA54bmE06222; Tue, 5 Nov 2002 04:37:48 GMT Message-ID: <3DC74B1B.5020408@eCosCentric.com> Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 20:37:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020827 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Schumacher, Gordon" CC: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [ECOS] memory layout X-SW-Source: 2002-11/txt/msg00079.txt.bz2 Schumacher, Gordon wrote: > What I've been doing is using 1.3.net for memory configuration, and 2.0 for > everything else (as 1.3.net can't actually build 2.0's repository IIRC.) The current binaries on http://sources.redhat.com/ecos/anoncvs.html which have been there for a few months definitely should. Jifl -- eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ --[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]-- --[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss