From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22432 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2003 16:37:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 22422 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2003 16:37:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO jifvik.dyndns.org) (62.253.130.87) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2003 16:37:43 -0000 Received: from eCosCentric.com (garibaldi.jifvik.org [172.31.1.2]) by jifvik.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28543846E; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 16:37:12 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <3E67793C.40008@eCosCentric.com> Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 16:37:00 -0000 From: Jonathan Larmour User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.2) Gecko/20021203 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Koeller, T." Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com References: <850597605E79D21182830008C7A4B9CF1EB4254E@COMM1> In-Reply-To: <850597605E79D21182830008C7A4B9CF1EB4254E@COMM1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [ECOS] RE: AT91 patches X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00091.txt.bz2 Koeller, T. wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > could you give an update on the current state of affairs > regarding the AT91/EB40 HAL split? I am about to start a new > project, and I definitly would like to get rid of my > patched source tree. They haven't made it into 2.0 beta. I intend to review and check them in between beta and final, although depending on the scale, it may be trunk only. I haven't at all forgotten. Jifl -- eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos and RedBoot experts --[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]-- --[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]-- Opinions==mine -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss