From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Lewin A.R.W. Edwards" To: Jonathan Larmour Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [ECOS] How to run eCos in SMDK41100 board Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:30:00 -0000 Message-id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010130232359.00b0a650@larwe.com> References: <001a01c08b2f$56472200$c408aa0a@inc.inventec> <3A7780B3.598D1676@redhat.com> <000501c08b38$345fd8e0$c408aa0a@inc.inventec> <4.3.2.7.2.20010130225032.00a96900@larwe.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010130230539.00b14720@larwe.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010130231450.00b0a430@larwe.com> <3A779342.4FC0DBD7@redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2001-01/msg00493.html >Thumb is not supported in any form in gcc 2.95.2. You have to use a >snapshot, which is what the instructions on the web page say. These instructions still talk about the 20000313 snapshot. It may be my personal CVS jinx, but the instructions on < http://sources.redhat.com/ecos/tools/win-thumb-elf.html > do not work (fails either building or configuring that 20000313 gcc snapshot; I forget which). It's therefore fairly certain that this process was either not tested with the above checkout date under cygwin, or the Red Hat anoncvs server when requested for a snapshot of that date gives something different. (The stackalign.pat doesn't apply either, or at least didn't for me). I remember discussing this whole matter when I first joined the ecos-discuss list in mid-November; has anything changed since then, to your knowledge? Is anyone on the list actually using a thumb ARM? === Lewin A.R.W. Edwards (Embedded Engineer) Work: http://www.digi-frame.com/ Personal: http://www.zws.com/ and http://www.larwe.com/ "Und setzet ihr nicht das Leben ein, Nie wird euch das Leben gewonnen sein."