Re: [ECOS] Redboot v1.94 for ixdp425

[s.s-c-h-m-i-t-t@web.de]

I just try to find out, why my own build does not allow to load the 
kernel but the prebuilt one does! If I knew how to build exactly the 
prebuilt redboot ROM binary I would have a baseline for further required 
adaptions (memory, UART, display, NPE instead of PCI-NIC, etc.).

Again my question: Did anybody of the ECOS-list build the 
IXDP425-ECOS-Redboot-v1.94-package and achieve to work proper (i.e. load 
a kernel) on their own proprietrary IXP42x hardware???

As I already said: The redboot on its own seems to work properly. But: 
After I load the kernel (load -r -b -v 0x06000000 zImage ; exec -c 
"console=ttyS1,115200 mem=63M" ) redboot seems to hang, however, nothing 
happens.

Thanks a lot for any help,

Stefan.

Annamalai Prakash schrieb:
> Prebuilt might not have some packages included ... why do you need to have
> an identical image ?..
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Prakash
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org
> [mailto:ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org]On Behalf Of
> s.s-c-h-m-i-t-t@web.de
> Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 3:58 AM
> To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: [ECOS] Redboot v1.94 for ixdp425
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> does anybody know how to obtain the same build-result as the prebuilt
> 
> ...redboot-intel-xscale-040330/bin/ixdp425/redboot_ROM.bin  (size:
> 167088) ???
> 
> Problem:
> The prebuilt one runs more or less and boots the linux kernel, the newly
> built redboot.bin (size: 250440) does not.
> 
> Did anybody of you achieve to build an identical image as the prebuilt
> one???
> 
> Regards,
> Stefan.
> 
> 
> --
> Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
> and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
> 
> 



-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss