Re: [ECOS]: Is eCos Hard Real Time OS ??

["R. Vamshi Krishna" <vamshi@cse.iitb.ac.in>]

Kozo Kakehi wrote:

>Hello. Vamshi.
>
> I'm a one of user in japan.
>
>in <Pine.LNX.4.61.0506241710050.5855@mars.cse.iitb.ac.in>
>   "Re: [ECOS]: Is eCos Hard Real Time OS ??"
>   "R Vamshi Krishna <vamshi@cse.iitb.ac.in>" wrote
>
>  
>
>>Then what parts do I re-write to make it hard-real time ?
>>Because I want to use eCos but also I need a hard reak-time
>>OS.
>>    
>>
>
> Choose eCos is better idea, and fast enough for realtime application.
>
> I don't know how hard real-time you need in your system.
>Where or what is a border about hard vs soft real-time.
>
> In my experience, someone force very hard response to OS, it's a bad design
>about elements (threads, messaging, mutex..) or whole system. In such system,
>may crash cause critical design.
>
> Let's try to use current eCos, just as it is.
>  
>
I think I might have given the wrong impression.
I would like to add a compliance layer.

That means that if somebody does not want hard real-time behaviour, he 
continue using eCos normally.
But if hard real-time is needed then he will use the alternative. i.e 
some specific scheduler, drivers, some
specific API etc ..


>// Kozo Kakehi from Osaka
>// kakehi@kme.co.jp
>  
>


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss