From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21507 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2005 14:37:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 21473 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Sep 2005 14:37:36 -0000 Received: from [212.13.207.199] (HELO snape.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.199) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:37:36 +0000 Received: by snape.ecoscentric.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id AD831DC977F; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:37:32 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.7.4] (max.barn.ecoscentric.com [192.168.7.4]) by snape.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8A3DC973C for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:37:26 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <432ECD26.4090203@ecoscentric.com> Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:59:00 -0000 From: John Dallaway User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050720) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org References: <68b1f76405091810591118123@mail.gmail.com> <20050918184248.GA8421@lunn.ch> <432E75B3.1040508@zurich.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <432E75B3.1040508@zurich.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [ECOS] Re: eCos Configuration Tool X-SW-Source: 2005-09/txt/msg00145.txt.bz2 Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 07:59:33PM +0200, Emilio Monti wrote: > >> Is there any plan to convert the "eCos Configuration Tool" in Java ? >> It would also be usefull to better integrate the eCos configuration >> in Eclipse. There are no such plans at present. While I would like to see the eCos Configuration Tool more closely integrated into the Eclipse workbench, re-implementation of the host tools has never been high on the maintainers' list of priorities. > My impression is that none of the maintainers actually use the > configtool. At least i don't use it, and always give debug > instructions using ecosconfig. The other maintainers are also mostly > unix people who like CLI programs and so use ecosconfig all the time. I, for one, use the eCos Configuration Tool. I find that the GUI offers a better overview of the configuration space. Many of my colleagues do prefer ecosconfig. It really is a matter of personal preference. John Dallaway eCosCentric Limited -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss