From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1979 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2006 15:16:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 1938 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Jun 2006 15:16:29 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from snape.ecoscentric.com (HELO snape.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.199) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:16:25 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snape.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDEFDC8054; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 16:16:22 +0100 (BST) Received: from snape.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (snape.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hx716z-TSZe7; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 16:16:22 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <449179C5.2070503@ecoscentric.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:16:00 -0000 From: John Dallaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Smithkowski Cc: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org References: <44911BA5.1050506@ecoscentric.com> <449151AF.3050206@ecoscentric.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [ECOS] Re: Problem with Config Tool on Cygwin X-SW-Source: 2006-06/txt/msg00133.txt.bz2 Tom Smithkowski wrote: >> This looks similar to the issue discussed at: >> >> http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2006-q2/msg00065.html >> >> As a workaround, it is currently possible to revert to version 1.5.18-1 >> of the "cygwin" package using the Cygwin Net Release Setup Program. >> >> Since the probable cause of this issue has been identified and patched, >> I will wait for a new release of the Cygwin DLL before investigating any >> further. > > Thank you for investigating this issue. Just to make sure I am > understanding correctly, your conclusion is that this is due to a > cygwin bug, and that you would expect that to be fixed in a future > release. Therefore, no changes to configtool are required at this > time. That is my hypothesis, yes. John Dallaway eCosCentric Limited -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss