public inbox for ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [ECOS] Recommendation on Evaluation boards
@ 2007-07-03  0:52 Klaus Nji
  2007-07-04 15:43 ` Ilija Koco
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Klaus Nji @ 2007-07-03  0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ecos-discuss

Any additional piece of information will be of help.
 
I am currently looking for an Evaluation board for an automotive application.
 
I have looked at the list currently listed on eCosCentric but could use some additional advice or recommendations based on recent experiences.  I want to minimize running into technical difficulties arising from incompatibility issues given my limited resources.
 
As of now, hardware requirements are:
 
• 32 or 64 bit CPU (CPU speed not crucial as time fastest dynamic is 1s). 
• Low Power Consumption or Sleep Mode capability 
• Expandable Flash Memory for field upgrade of firmware 
• 3x RS-232 
• CAN interface 
• 1 Audio/Video 
• 1 USB 2.0 port (not mandatory)
• Couple of analog and digital I/O 
• eCos recently ported onto board with minimal technical difficulties.  

Again, any advice from recent experiences will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks in advance,
 
 
Klaus

--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-04 16:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-03  0:52 [ECOS] Recommendation on Evaluation boards Klaus Nji
2007-07-04 15:43 ` Ilija Koco
2007-07-04 16:05   ` Ilija Koco

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).