public inbox for ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alois Zoitl <alois@gmx.at>
To: eCos Disuss <ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [ECOS] Thread activation disturbed by lower priority threads]
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:05:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46C4ADE6.9080101@gmx.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070808081015.GB29246@lunn.ch>

Hi,

thanks you definitely pointed me into the right direction. The problem 
is located with the mutexes. I removed all mutexes in questions and set 
my timing measurement points directly after the semaphore that is in 
charge of activating my threads.After making more measurements and 
playing a little bit around I found it that when I set the priority 
inversion protocol to none (using cyg_mutex_set_protocol). The timing is 
as expected. So I thought it could be that before I was using priority 
ceiling which would be an explanation for the delay as every time a 
mutex is gathered the thread will get priorty 0. So I changed to 
priority inheritance. This from my point of view should do the job as I 
like to have it done.
But when using priority inheritance I get the same bad timing as in the 
beginning.

And as longer I think I don't know why the tread activation of the 
highest priority thread is prolonged by threads holding a mutex with 
priority inheritance where each of the treads that my also get this 
mutex has a lower priority. So I'm completly confuesed. Any Ideas what 
could be the problem or what I could do?

For my current tests no priority inversion protocol is just fine, but 
for further more complected tests I think i will need something like 
priority inheritance so it would be nice to have it.

Thanks,
Alois

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-16 20:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-07 14:02 Alois Z.
2007-08-07 14:41 ` Andrew Lunn
2007-08-07 17:35   ` Paul D. DeRocco
2007-08-07 18:55     ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found]   ` <20070808075810.250840@gmx.net>
2007-08-08  8:10     ` Andrew Lunn
2007-08-16 20:05       ` Alois Zoitl [this message]
2007-08-16 20:22         ` Andrew Lunn
     [not found]           ` <20070817072849.22110@gmx.net>
2007-08-17  8:08             ` Andrew Lunn
2007-08-17  7:34 Alois Z.
2007-08-17  8:08 ` Pieter-Jan Busschaert
2007-08-17  8:14   ` Andrew Lunn
2007-08-17  8:46     ` Pieter-Jan Busschaert
2007-08-17  8:59       ` Andrew Lunn
2007-08-23 20:38   ` Alois Zoitl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46C4ADE6.9080101@gmx.at \
    --to=alois@gmx.at \
    --cc=ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).