From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23840 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2008 13:36:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 23831 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jan 2008 13:36:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from 204-133-123-27.dia.static.slbbi.com (HELO mail.chez-thomas.org) (204.133.123.27) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:36:01 +0000 Received: by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix, from userid 999) id 39E1B1950218; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:35:59 -0700 (MST) Received: from hermes.chez-thomas.org (hermes_local [192.168.1.101]) by mail.chez-thomas.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A016C19501A1; Thu, 10 Jan 2008 06:35:56 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <47861F3B.5090803@mlbassoc.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:36:00 -0000 From: Gary Thomas User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lopy CC: eCos Discussion References: <19742966.42231199971885201.JavaMail.www@wwinf8204> In-Reply-To: <19742966.42231199971885201.JavaMail.www@wwinf8204> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [ECOS] Re: =?UTF-8?B?UsOpZi4gOiBSZTogW0VDT1NdIFByb2JsZW0gd2l0aCBUQ1AvSVA=?= =?UTF-8?B?IHN0YWNr?= X-SW-Source: 2008-01/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2 Note: this reply belongs on the eCos discussion list, not me personally. Lopy wrote: > Hi, > > > > We have experimented this kind of problem, but only with MultiCast, or > with big packets, but I don't think that is the same problem than you > ask for. > > > > A/ If the DHCP server don't give the opt 3 (GATEWAY), it's not possible > to send MultiCast packets. But there is no problem for sending unicast > packet. As the original message did not mention multicast, I doubt this is relevant. > B/ We have another problem (bypassed but not fixed), who is than big > packets ( who need to be fragmented ) are not send. But we think that is > a driver problem, so if you don't have the same microprocessor perhaps > you don't have the same problem. > > > > We work with MPC8270 on a own designed board. Can you elaborate on your problems? Are you using the FCC driver code which is in the public eCos repository? > -----ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org a écrit : ----- > > Pour : Antoine Zen-Ruffinen > De : Gary Thomas > Envoyé par : ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org > Date : 10/01/2008 14:17 > cc : ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org > Objet : Re: [ECOS] Problem with TCP/IP stack > > Antoine Zen-Ruffinen wrote: > > Hi List folks, > > > > I've a problem with the TCP/IP stack: > > - I use TFTP to load my program in redboot. That work fine. > > - My application start, call init_all_network_interfaces(), it do the > > DHCP stuff. That work fine. > > - Then I open a socket and try to send / receive data. No packet > is even send. > > > > Does someone has already seen such problem ? > > Any idea ? > > We'll need more data than this in order to help. > * What's the target platform? > * How did you configure eCos for your failing application? > * Have you run any of the standard eCos network test programs? > * How do you know nothing was sent? What sort of debugging > have you tried so far? -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss