From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11759 invoked by alias); 2 Dec 2008 16:26:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 11695 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Dec 2008 16:26:03 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.uni-ulm.de (HELO mail.uni-ulm.de) (134.60.1.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:25:03 +0000 Received: from [134.60.77.113] (discovery.informatik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.77.113]) by smtp.uni-ulm.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mB2GOxvH011679; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 17:24:59 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <49356198.5020608@uni-ulm.de> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 17:29:00 -0000 From: Vladimir Nikolov User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lars Poeschel CC: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org References: <49351941.20002@uni-ulm.de> <200812021255.22428.larsi@wh2.tu-dresden.de> <4935472B.3060905@uni-ulm.de> <200812021621.53503.larsi@wh2.tu-dresden.de> In-Reply-To: <200812021621.53503.larsi@wh2.tu-dresden.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DCC-HP_X86_64_4CPU-Metrics: poseidon 1245; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] eCos port for MPC5567 (e200z6) X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 Hi Lars, > On Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2008, Vladimir Nikolov wrote: > >> Dear Lars, >> >> >>> I've done a port to the MB91302 controller, which is a predecessor. It >>> shouldn't be much effort to do a MB91460 port based on that. >>> >> How much time did you spend making it? >> > > I think in sum it was about 3 - 4 months but you can not compare this because > I had to do the whole port including the initial fr30 architecture port, > mb91302 variant and a platform. > You now have in both cases a running archtitecture port (powerpc or fr30) and > a variant that is very close to what you need. So most of the porting effort > is already done. What you have to do hardly depends on the platform you have > and the drivers you need. > What kind of evaluation board do you have ? > I still cannot decide between the "FlexDevel Starter" evaluation boards (with the MPC5567) http://www.tzm.de/Flexray/FlexDevel_Starter.html and the Fujitsu SK-91465X-100PMC (with the MB91460) http://mcu.emea.fujitsu.com/mcu_tool/detail/SK-91465X-100PMC.htm . Well, actually the MB91460 seems to have a fr60 architecture. Unfortunatelly, I cannot assess whether a new fr60 architecture port would be necessary for the latter. > >> Were there any major issues while doing the port? >> > > Yes, the architecture and variant part ;-) > I see ;-) ! > >> I'm thinking about how long it would take to do a MPC5567 port on my >> own, because this MCU is a little more powerful >> than the MB91460 ... >> > > You have to decide on your own (or ask ecoscentric if they have a commercial > port ready to use for you). Thats a good idea, maybe they have! > I would be glad to see another fr30 architecture, > with powerpc you have an architecture port that is more established and > tested... > That is also a reason why I tend to the FlexDevel Starter Board ... Vladimir -- Vladimir Nikolov, vladimir.nikolov@uni-ulm.de |UNI ULM http://www-vs.informatik.uni-ulm.de/dept/staff/nikolov/ |DISTRIBUTED Room O27-346, Phone: +49-731-5024146 [+49-179-7455069] |SYSTEMS LAB -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss