From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32515 invoked by alias); 5 Jun 2009 21:56:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 32356 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Jun 2009 21:56:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from queueout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (HELO queueout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com) (81.103.221.33) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:56:04 +0000 Received: from aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20090605213711.RNLJ5579.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 22:37:11 +0100 Received: from cog.dallaway.org.uk ([86.9.207.237]) by aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20090605213710.XVAX13254.aamtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@cog.dallaway.org.uk>; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 22:37:10 +0100 Received: from cog.dallaway.org.uk (cog.dallaway.org.uk [127.0.0.1]) by cog.dallaway.org.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n55Lb8IJ024595; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 22:37:08 +0100 Message-ID: <4A299004.2070706@dallaway.org.uk> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:56:00 -0000 From: John Dallaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090327) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D8yvind_Harboe?= CC: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org References: <20090605201639.GA9333@ubuntu.local> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [ECOS] Re: eCos contributions and development projects X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 Hi Øyvind On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 09:45:57PM +0200, Øyvind Harboe wrote: > >> Further details at: http://ecos.sourceware.org/contrib.html > > Is it just me or does this page "smell" stale? [ snip ] > I'm thinking that it would make sense to have older & new stuff on a > separate pages not to dilute the new stuff. I was thinking exactly the same while I was editing the page earlier today. We should continue to recognise contributions from the past, but the page is now too long. There are also a number of contributions missing from the list. I will look at splitting the content into separate pages. John Dallaway -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss