From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9907 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2013 17:54:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 9897 invoked by uid 89); 1 Nov 2013 17:54:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail.carallon.com Received: from mail.carallon.com (HELO mail.carallon.com) (95.177.28.122) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:54:31 +0000 X-MDAV-Result: clean X-MDAV-Processed: mail.carallon.com, Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:54:29 +0000 Received: from [172.20.1.41] by mail.carallon.com (Cipher TLSv1:-SHA:128) (MDaemon PRO v13.6.0) with ESMTP id md50001443512.msg for ; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:54:29 +0000 X-Spam-Processed: mail.carallon.com, Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:54:29 +0000 (not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source) X-MDRemoteIP: 172.20.1.41 X-Return-Path: andrewp@carallon.com X-Envelope-From: andrewp@carallon.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org Message-ID: <5273EAD3.3020606@carallon.com> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:54:00 -0000 From: Andrew Parlane User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Garnett , ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org References: <52729021.3080205@carallon.com> <5273DFAE.1080000@calivar.com> <5273E2EE.3010908@carallon.com> <5273E7FC.7010907@calivar.com> <5273E90C.2010807@carallon.com> <5273E9FB.40505@calivar.com> In-Reply-To: <5273E9FB.40505@calivar.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [ECOS] Spurious interrupt on ARM. X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00010.txt.bz2 Ah, ok. I already fixed it locally, I just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing something and also make others aware of the issue. Thanks, Andrew On 01/11/2013 17:50, Nick Garnett wrote: > > On 01/11/13 17:46, Andrew Parlane wrote: >> Excellent thanks. I guess we're a bit out of date. > Not really. I have an internal change here that is not in the public > sources. I'll take a look at pushing it out to the public repository. In > the meantime you can just update your sources locally. > > > > -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss