From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 106880 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2016 15:43:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 106870 invoked by uid 89); 3 Feb 2016 15:43:10 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:TLS1.0, H*r:sk:ecos-di X-HELO: meduna.org Received: from www.meduna.org (HELO meduna.org) (92.240.244.38) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 15:43:10 +0000 Received: from 78-141-77-45.dynamic.orange.sk ([78.141.77.45] helo=[192.168.130.22]) by meduna.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aQzaC-0004qd-2u for ecos-discuss@sourceware.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 16:43:05 +0100 To: "ecos-discuss@sourceware.org" From: Stanislav Meduna X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <56B22002.7010503@meduna.org> Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 15:43:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated-User: stano@meduna.org X-Authenticator: dovecot_plain X-Spam-Score: -6.9 X-Spam-Score-Int: -68 X-Exim-Version: 4.72 (build at 13-Jul-2014 12:42:58) X-Date: 2016-02-03 16:43:05 X-Connected-IP: 78.141.77.45:54515 X-Message-Linecount: 28 X-Body-Linecount: 16 X-Message-Size: 834 X-Body-Size: 411 X-Received-Count: 1 X-Recipient-Count: 1 X-Local-Recipient-Count: 1 X-Local-Recipient-Defer-Count: 0 X-Local-Recipient-Fail-Count: 0 X-IsSubscribed: yes Subject: [ECOS] eCos and Keil X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 Hi, did anybody try to tweak the eCos to allow building with Keil MDK-ARM? The thing is Keil produces _much_ smaller (a saving of 1/3 is often doable) and faster code. For embedded systems this matters a lot. I understand that this is not trivial, as some of the code is dependent on gcc-specific features and the build system is tailored to the GNU tools. Thanks -- Stano -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss