From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 33161 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2016 13:20:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 33147 invoked by uid 89); 18 Jun 2016 13:20:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=rebuilding, same, same! X-HELO: mail.ecoscentric.com Received: from albus.ecoscentric.com (HELO mail.ecoscentric.com) (212.13.207.200) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 13:19:56 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A40A8A778; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 14:19:53 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.ecoscentric.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (albus.ecoscentric.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jjFB-Gvnxi06; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 14:19:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.4.3] (woc.schuilenburg.org [82.153.175.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: alexs) by mail.ecoscentric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B73BDA8A743; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 14:19:52 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.ecoscentric.com B73BDA8A743 References: <07FFDDED6CBCCE4E9FBD46AEC3EBFD4F02C50652@exchange> <07FFDDED6CBCCE4E9FBD46AEC3EBFD4F02C50BB3@exchange> <07FFDDED6CBCCE4E9FBD46AEC3EBFD4F02C50BF3@exchange> <576330BB.7080803@schuilenburg.org> <030f01d1c84d$6d0cafc0$47260f40$@itrgmbh.de> <5763CC7C.7080606@schuilenburg.org> <036101d1c959$16b15dd0$44141970$@itrgmbh.de> To: Richard Rauch , ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org From: Alex Schuilenburg Message-ID: <57654A7A.6080206@ecoscentric.com> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 13:20:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <036101d1c959$16b15dd0$44141970$@itrgmbh.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Subject: Re: AW: AW: [ECOS] Re: eCos Configuration Tool clewan and rebuild X-SW-Source: 2016-06/txt/msg00008.txt.bz2 On 18/06/16 13:01, Richard Rauch wrote: > We delete the build folders only, but not the .ecc file. > If rebuilding with GUI config tool (after build folders deleted) with same > .ecc file, the result is exactly the same!=20 It ought to be - the same libcdl is called to regenerate the build tree if you use the same .ecc file. What I am saying is: File->New in the anoncvs configtool can generate a different configuration from the ecosconfig new anoncvs command. -- Alex http://www.ecoscentric.com/ The eCos Experts -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss