From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1217 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2006 14:54:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 1204 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Aug 2006 14:54:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.jenoptik.com (HELO mail.jenoptik.com) (217.17.196.194) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:53:54 +0000 Received: from mail.jenoptik.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.jenoptik.com (8.13.7/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k7BErnrn011437; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:53:50 +0200 Received: from JO-EX01.JENOPTIK.NET ([10.250.1.4]) by mail.jenoptik.com (8.13.7/8.13.1/REC) with ESMTP id k7BErlSg011430; Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:53:49 +0200 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <5A8A17126B73AC4C83968F6C4505E3C504C7EADD@JO-EX01.JENOPTIK.NET> From: "Neundorf, Alexander" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D8yvind_Harboe?= Cc: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: AW: [ECOS] Splitting the eCos repository X-SW-Source: 2006-08/txt/msg00111.txt.bz2 > Von: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org >=20 > How about splitting the eCos repository? >=20 > - It would help to market the support for multiple repositories. I've > seen a lot of messy maintainence due to the lack of this knowledge. > - It would reduce the size of the eCos repository that 90% use. >=20 > Something like: >=20 > - eCos core. Up to and including architecture HAL's > - eCos devboard. Contains all the HAL's for development boards. > - eCos highlevel/net. All high level(many files) stuff like net, > microwindows, etc. goes > - eCos legacy. >=20 > 1 eCos repository is too little, 10 is too many. :-) >=20 > The user would then have to either use a development board HAL as-is > or create his own eCos repository, probably duplicating & modifying an > existing HAL. I'd say not before configtool supports it. But it would also make creating a public "experimental" repository possible= (e.g. on sourceforge) for stuff which didn't make it yet into the main rep= ository. Alex -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss