From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14395 invoked by alias); 28 Jun 2007 08:23:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 14384 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jun 2007 08:23:07 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.176) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 08:23:05 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id l24so637309waf for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 01:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.61.1 with SMTP id o1mr1292350wak.1183018983423; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 01:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.51.15 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 01:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <68185b500706280123td8b1f42ib855ab4d511ba68a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:49:00 -0000 From: "Michele Paselli" To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <4682ECF0.2010303@mlbassoc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <19489034.1182961244153.JavaMail.root@ps22> <4682ECF0.2010303@mlbassoc.com> Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] Interfacing directly to the low level ethernet driver, how?? X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00267.txt.bz2 Could you plase be more precise? I don't thing I got your question, I thought that the version of FreeBSD on eCos didn't implement RAW sockets. Or at least that's what I understood from previous threads here. Am I wrong? Thanks, Michele On 6/28/07, Gary Thomas wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Michele Paselli wrote: > > Hi , > > > > I'm about to develop a raw ethernet driver. After spending quite a lot > > of time reading the forum and analyzing the code I finally decide to > > implement a raw I/O API as suggested by Grant Edwards here: > > > > http://www.cygwin.com/ml/ecos-discuss/2003-06/msg00017.html > > What's the point of this? Couldn't you solve your problem by > using RAW sockets? > > The reason for asking is just to point out that your ethernet > "wire" will be pretty useless except for whatever raw traffic > you push across it. > > - -- > - ------------------------------------------------------------ > Gary Thomas | Consulting for the > MLB Associates | Embedded world > - ------------------------------------------------------------ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFGguzumaKbSsQGV8ARAvteAJwLo2CbRE+ZiKt2QCzuFTKm7qktaQCgnVUg > EvW2AkdKd9yqyEY6+LzvbxQ= > =SC5P > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss