From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14544 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2007 08:15:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 14536 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Apr 2007 08:15:23 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from web94303.mail.in2.yahoo.com (HELO web94303.mail.in2.yahoo.com) (203.104.16.213) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with SMTP; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 09:15:20 +0100 Received: (qmail 1053 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Apr 2007 08:15:15 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: F8nVj70VM1lYBLC58R9SXZ48kOoHN3_veJ4heyit Received: from [122.169.12.76] by web94303.mail.in2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 09:15:15 BST Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 08:15:00 -0000 From: tejas pawaskar To: eCos Discuss MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <782550.474.qm@web94303.mail.in2.yahoo.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [ECOS] smsc91c111 driver for redboot X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00040.txt.bz2 I am using smsc91c111 ethernet driver as part of my redboot bootloader. The base address is 0x10000000. I get the following error "smsc_lan91cxx_init: No 91Cxx signature found" >From the driver source code, it seems that the driver was not able to probe the signature in BS register. Is this means that my smsc91c111 chip itself is not getting selected? What's the basic configuration settings to get the chip going? Regards Tejas Pawaskar __________________________________________________________ Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new http://in.answers.yahoo.com/ -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss