From: "Koeller, T." <Thomas.Koeller@baslerweb.com>
To: 'Jonathan Larmour' <jifl@eCosCentric.com>
Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
Subject: RE: [ECOS] RE: AT91 patches
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 14:15:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <850597605E79D21182830008C7A4B9CF1EB4254E@COMM1> (raw)
Hi Jonathan,
could you give an update on the current state of affairs
regarding the AT91/EB40 HAL split? I am about to start a new
project, and I definitly would like to get rid of my
patched source tree.
Thomas
-----------------------------------------------
Thomas Koeller, Software Development
Basler Vision Technologies
An der Strusbek 60-62
22926 Ahrensburg
Germany
Tel +49 (4102) 463-390
Fax +49 (4102) 463-46390
mailto:Thomas.Koeller@baslerweb.com
http://www.baslerweb.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Larmour [mailto:jifl@eCosCentric.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:29 PM
> To: Daniel Leu
> Cc: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [ECOS] RE: AT91 patches
>
>
> Daniel Leu wrote:
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > First, I'm pleased to see some work on the AT91 port. THANKS!
> >
> > I second Jani's statement. Couldn't we start with the AT91
> > rearchitecture. This is the basis of all the other AT91 based
> > platforms and I don't think that they need the Flash changes.
>
> Yes, I think will move forward with just the AT91 and EB40
> changes, and
> drop the flash driver for now. Doing that much at least for
> the moment
> should be uncontentious.
>
> Jifl
> --
> eCosCentric http://www.eCosCentric.com/
> <info@eCosCentric.com>
> --[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
> --[ can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln ]--
> Opinions==mine
>
>
> --
> Before posting, please read the FAQ:
http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
next reply other threads:[~2003-03-06 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-03-06 14:15 Koeller, T. [this message]
2003-03-06 16:37 ` Jonathan Larmour
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-30 16:12 Koeller, T.
2003-01-30 16:12 Doug Fraser
2003-01-30 16:18 ` Jonathan Larmour
2003-01-30 14:54 Doug Fraser
2003-01-30 15:32 ` Jonathan Larmour
2003-01-30 13:13 Koeller, T.
2003-01-30 12:22 Koeller, T.
2003-01-30 12:37 ` Jani Monoses
2003-01-30 15:29 ` Jonathan Larmour
2003-01-30 19:54 ` Daniel Leu
2003-01-30 23:12 ` Jonathan Larmour
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=850597605E79D21182830008C7A4B9CF1EB4254E@COMM1 \
--to=thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com \
--cc=ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jifl@eCosCentric.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).