From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30427 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2008 16:30:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 30412 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Apr 2008 16:30:20 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from 0x50a0e40c.unknown.tele.dk (HELO www2.sagio.com) (80.160.228.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:29:56 +0000 Received: from sagio.com (saturn-v.sagiooffice.local [172.16.136.1]) by www2.sagio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC14F605C6 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 18:29:54 +0200 (CEST) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: From: "Anders Olsen" To: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: [ECOS] FW: eCOsPro - is it worth the money X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00116.txt.bz2 =20 Hi We're small development team looking at the eCOS OS. As far as we can see, the source code available in the CVS is quite old and we have to buy the eCOSPro package from eCosCentric in order to get sourcecode there is up-to-date. Is the eCOSPro worth the money or not....=20=20 Or is we missing something.... Best regards Anders Olsen -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss