From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32449 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2008 17:13:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 32438 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Apr 2008 17:13:34 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from 0x50a0e40c.unknown.tele.dk (HELO www2.sagio.com) (80.160.228.12) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:13:14 +0000 Received: from sagio.com (saturn-v.sagiooffice.local [172.16.136.1]) by www2.sagio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CA5F605FF; Mon, 7 Apr 2008 19:13:11 +0200 (CEST) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 17:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <47FA4F01.60400@mlbassoc.com> From: "Anders Olsen" To: "Gary Thomas" Cc: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: RE: [ECOS] FW: eCOsPro - is it worth the money X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00121.txt.bz2 =20 The target is a ST based ARM (STR71x ARM7TDMI). Well we have the eCOS running on the target basically en has started writing drivers for our platform (I2C, SPI, , Realtime, Atmel Dataflash...)=20 But when looking at the JIFFS2 filesystem, it requires Flash drivers V2. But Flash driver V2 seams not to be available in the CVS. Another point by eCOSPro is that i contains a more stable version of the JIFFS2 filesystem, than the one available through CVS. Anders -----Original Message----- From: Gary Thomas [mailto:gary@mlbassoc.com]=20 Sent: 7. april 2008 18:43 To: Anders Olsen Cc: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] FW: eCOsPro - is it worth the money Anders Olsen wrote: >=20=20 > Hi >=20 > We're small development team looking at the eCOS OS. As far as we can=20 > see, the source code available in the CVS is quite old and we have to=20 > buy the eCOSPro package from eCosCentric in order to get sourcecode=20 > there is up-to-date. I beg to differ; the CVS is fully up to date. There may be offerings (targets and features) which eCosPro has that aren't available, but AFAIK, nothing that makes the CVS out of date... > Is the eCOSPro worth the money or not....=20=20 It depends. eCosPro would be indicated if: * You need a target or feature that they provide not in CVS * You want paid technical support What target are you looking at? What features do you need? -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss