From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6956 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2008 08:16:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 6941 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Apr 2008 08:16:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from 0x50a0e40b.unknown.tele.dk (HELO titan.sagio.com) (80.160.228.11) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 08:15:32 +0000 Received: from sagio.com (webmail.sagio.com [172.16.136.1]) by titan.sagio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0983F4B5B; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 10:15:29 +0200 (CEST) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 08:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: From: "Anders Olsen" To: "Tom Deconinck" , X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: RE: [ECOS] FW: eCOsPro - is it worth the money X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2 Hi Thanks - We will try this... Anders -----Original Message----- From: Tom Deconinck [mailto:t.deconinck@gmail.com]=20 Sent: 8. april 2008 08:48 To: Anders Olsen; ecos-discuss@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] FW: eCOsPro - is it worth the money Flash V2 is available in CVS on it's own branch. You can easily merge in those changes with the latest trunk sources. Just checkout the latest from the trunk and replace the following directories with their flash_v2 counterparts: io/flash dev/flash redboot fs/jffs2 Tom On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Anders Olsen wrote: > > The target is a ST based ARM (STR71x ARM7TDMI). Well we have the=20 > eCOS running on the target basically en has started writing drivers=20 > for our platform (I2C, SPI, , Realtime, Atmel Dataflash...) > > > But when looking at the JIFFS2 filesystem, it requires Flash drivers V2. > But Flash driver V2 seams not to be available in the CVS. > > > Another point by eCOSPro is that i contains a more stable version of=20 > the > JIFFS2 filesystem, than the one available through CVS. > > > > Anders > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Gary Thomas [mailto:gary@mlbassoc.com] > Sent: 7. april 2008 18:43 > To: Anders Olsen > Cc: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org > Subject: Re: [ECOS] FW: eCOsPro - is it worth the money > > Anders Olsen wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > We're small development team looking at the eCOS OS. As far as we=20 > can > see, the source code available in the CVS is quite old and we=20 > have to > buy the eCOSPro package from eCosCentric in order to get=20 > sourcecode > there is up-to-date. > > I beg to differ; the CVS is fully up to date. There may be offerings > (targets and features) which eCosPro has that aren't available, but=20=20 > AFAIK, nothing that makes the CVS out of date... > > > Is the eCOSPro worth the money or not.... > > It depends. eCosPro would be indicated if: > * You need a target or feature that they provide not in CVS > * You want paid technical support > > What target are you looking at? > What features do you need? > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Gary Thomas | Consulting for the > MLB Associates | Embedded world > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > -- > Before posting, please read the FAQ:=20 > http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos > and search the list archive:=20 > http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss > > -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss