From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27519 invoked by alias); 1 Feb 2007 01:56:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 27307 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Feb 2007 01:56:54 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from bay0-omc1-s24.bay0.hotmail.com (HELO bay0-omc1-s24.bay0.hotmail.com) (65.54.246.96) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:56:48 +0000 Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.229.27]) by bay0-omc1-s24.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:56:46 -0800 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:56:46 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.54.229.220 by by110fd.bay110.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:56:43 GMT X-Sender: iucgnaw@msn.com In-Reply-To: <20070130214625.GG22661@lunn.ch> From: "wang cui" To: andrew@lunn.ch, htalanki@comtechefdata.com Cc: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org Bcc: Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:56:00 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312; format=flowed X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Subject: Re: [ECOS] In-built shell for Redboot X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2 I think he want to call function by name directly without a warpper of "RedBoot_cmd()" macro. Actually VxWorks provide this function. It strips all symbles from application image, then generate a source file contains all symbles, then add it into project and rebuild it. Then user can call all functions directly from VxWorks shell. However, I think Redboot style is good enough. But what I am thinking about is: Can we divide the shell functionality from Redboot and create a new package(suppose to be RedShell)? Because we always need a shell in application, and there are very many things have been implemented in Redboot. If so, we can reduce a lot of work in writing application shell. >From: Andrew Lunn >To: Harish Talanki >CC: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org >Subject: Re: [ECOS] In-built shell for Redboot >Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 22:46:25 +0100 > >On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 02:09:52PM -0700, Harish Talanki wrote: > > eCos Experts, > > Is there a way I can invoke a function call directly from the shell, > > with Redboot boot loader. > > > I want to add bunch of function calls to the code, and be able to > > directly invoke them from > > command line. Is there any package or configuration option I need to > > choose? > > > > Right now I keep adding new Redboot Commands, to get arround this. > >What is the difference between adding a redboot command and calling a >function? All a redboot command does is call a function. > > Andrew > >-- >Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos >and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss > _________________________________________________________________ Ãâ·ÑÏÂÔØ MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/ -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss