From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4390 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2005 17:48:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4379 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jul 2005 17:48:49 -0000 Received: from outbound3.mail.tds.net (HELO outbound3.mail.tds.net) (216.170.230.93) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:48:49 +0000 Received: from xsv1.hitmsn.hi-techniques.com (h216-170-131-14.dsl.tds.net [216.170.131.14]) by outbound3.mail.tds.net (8.13.4/8.12.2) with ESMTP id j6LHmlQU024712 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:48:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: by XSV1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:57:41 -0500 Message-ID: From: paape@Hi-Techniques.com To: ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:48:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: [ECOS] bsd stack buffering X-SW-Source: 2005-07/txt/msg00227.txt.bz2 Hello, I would like to significantly increase the 256KB limit for socket buffering. Does anyone know of: 1.) anything that would preclude me from doing this, whether in the stack or eCos itself? 2.) any other parameter[s] that would need to be modified in conjuction with this, other than the initial stack memory allocation? Dan -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss