From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16800 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2002 16:32:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16792 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2002 16:32:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (64.4.15.129) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Jul 2002 16:32:15 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:32:15 -0700 Received: from 213.122.202.111 by lw10fd.law10.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 16:32:14 GMT X-Originating-IP: [213.122.202.111] From: "Bruce Smith" To: ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com Bcc: Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:32:00 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jul 2002 16:32:15.0242 (UTC) FILETIME=[ACF3FEA0:01C22E78] Subject: [ECOS] Red Hat Flip-Flops on Future of eCos X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00275.txt.bz2 http://sdtimes.com/news/058/emb1.htm Most interesting. Would the two eCos developers at Red Hat care to step forward and identify yourselves? As Red Hat is still in the eCos business, could a sales person please contact me with your current rates for eCos development and support. regards bruce _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss