From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ecos-discuss-return-40005-listarch-ecos-discuss=sources.redhat.com@ecos.sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 18429 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2008 16:51:54 -0000
Received: (qmail 18416 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Apr 2008 16:51:52 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mgcp1.bloomberg.com (HELO mgcp1.bloomberg.com) (208.22.56.39)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:51:34 +0000
Received: from ny1520.bloomberg.com ([10.16.11.97])   by mgcp1.bloomberg.com with ESMTP; 02 Apr 2008 12:51:32 -0400
Received: from NY2528-DR.corp.bloomberg.com (ny2528-dr.corp.bloomberg.com [10.14.21.30]) 	by ny1520.bloomberg.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m32GpRUx023692; 	Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:51:27 -0400
Received: from ny2545.corp.bloomberg.com ([172.20.73.98]) by NY2528-DR.corp.bloomberg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 	 Wed, 2 Apr 2008 12:51:26 -0400
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; 	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 16:51:00 -0000
Message-ID: <F31C1582037F5041B0CD525FD870AE6A774278@ny2545.corp.bloomberg.com>
In-Reply-To: <ft0dam$o5b$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <ft0dam$o5b$1@ger.gmane.org>
From: "Chris Zimman" <czimman@bloomberg.com>
To: "Grant Edwards" <grante@visi.com>, <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <ecos-discuss.ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ecos-discuss-subscribe@ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:ecos-discuss@ecos.sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ecos-discuss-help@ecos.sourceware.org>, <http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@ecos.sourceware.org
Subject: RE: [ECOS]  On ARM7 can one of FIQ/IRQ be used for non-eCos stuff?
X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00012.txt.bz2

> From looking at the ARM/arch hal stuff, it looks like eCos
> expects to handle both IRQ and FIQ interrupts.  AFAICT, all of
> the interrupt sources in my part (Samsung S3C4530) can be
> assigned to either IRQ or FIQ.
>=20
> Is there any reason why eCos has to have control of both
> interrupt sources if all of the peripherals which eCos is
> handling are on just one of them?

Just change the FIQ vector to point to your handler.  I don't know of
anything that uses FIQ right now anyhow.

--Chris

--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss