From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3016 invoked by alias); 11 Jul 2002 21:04:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact ecos-discuss-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: ecos-discuss-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3008 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2002 21:04:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MAILHOST.stratalight.com) (206.184.26.51) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Jul 2002 21:04:29 -0000 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 14:04:00 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: From: "George Sosnowski" To: "eCos Discussion" Subject: [ECOS] malloc/new in DSRs X-SW-Source: 2002-07/txt/msg00166.txt.bz2 If malloc is configed to be threadsafe in ecos.ecc, then is it ok to use malloc/new/free/delete in DSRs? I assume it is, but want to make sure. Thanks, George -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss